PRESS RELEASE
Contact:
Health Policy Institute of Ohio
(614) 224-4950
Study Estimates Economic Effects of Medicaid Spending Changes in Ohio
Job and Economic Losses Vary Across Counties
According
to a study commissioned by the Health Policy Institute of Ohio, the
reductions in Medicaid growth in Ohio’s current biennial budget could
result in a $2.4 billion loss to the state economy, including the loss
of almost 24,000 jobs. In addition, the study found that these effects
were not spread evenly across the state, with urban and southeastern
counties bearing the brunt of the costs. The job losses would also
cause the state to lose $33 million in income taxes over the two years.
The
study, “Estimating Local Effects of Medicaid Expenditure Changes,”
examined the economic effects of Medicaid cost containment measures in
Ohio’s current biennial budget. These measures reduced
state-generated dollar spending on Medicaid by $745 million ($268
million in SFY 2006 and $477 million in SFY 2007) and federal-generated
spending by $1.21 billion ($396.6 million in SFY 2006 and $810.3
million in SFY 2007) from the projected spending required to have
maintained the Medicaid program’s existing payment and coverage
policies. These numbers do not include changes to Ohio’s Disability
Medical Assistance (DMA) program as DMA spending does not draw down
federal matching dollars.
The economic
effects of these cost containment measures are not a simple “one for
one” loss of dollars because for every state-generated dollar Ohio
spends on Medicaid, the federal government matches that dollar with an
average of $1.40 in federal funds.
In
addition, these state and federal dollars create additional economic
value as they ripple through the economy, known as the multiplier
effect. This rippling effect results in every state-generated
dollar Ohio spends on Medicaid generating an estimated $3.18 in
economic value.
The effect of Medicaid
expenditures can be significant given as they account for over three
percent of Ohio’s gross state product (the total value of goods and
services produced in the state). Moreover, research estimates
that every one million dollars spent on Medicaid activities accounts
for about 32 jobs in the Ohio economy.
In
addition to the economic and job losses, the study also found that the
economic burden of slower growth in Medicaid spending is not shared
equally across Ohio’s 88 counties. Counties in the south, southeast and
eastern parts of Ohio are the most economically vulnerable to changes
in Medicaid expenditures. In addition, most of Ohio’s urban
counties and some counties in the middle of the state also show a
greater vulnerability to changes in Medicaid expenditures.
This
study does not mean that Ohio should ignore ways to slow the rate of
growth in Medicaid spending. Nor does it mean that Ohio can afford to
finance Medicaid through tax increases or reductions in other state
spending. As this study shows, each method of financing Medicaid brings
its own state and local economic consequences and trade-offs, which
need to be considered in future budget cycles.
The
study was completed by Anand Desai, Yushim Kim, and Robert Greenbaum of
the Ohio State University and analyzed census data, tax and job
information from the Ohio Department of Development, and Medicaid
information from the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
Additional support for the study was provided by the Health Foundation
of Greater Cincinnati.
For more information, including references, analysis, and data tables, please see http://www.healthpolicyohio.org/publications/medicaidstudy.html.
The
Health Policy Institute of Ohio is an independent, nonpartisan
organization that forecasts health trends, analyzes key health issues,
and communicates current research to Ohio policymakers, legislators,
and others. For more information on the Institute, call (614) 224-4950
or go to http://www.healthpolicyohio.org.
--30--